Recently, Bill O'Reilly decided to pull a Dan Quayle and become hot and bothered over a the idea of a fictional character having a baby out of wedlock. Just as Quayle made a jackass out of himself by making the television character Murphy Brown the target of one of his "family values" speeches, O'Reilly recently decided to go on a tirade over remarks actress Jennifer Aniston made regarding her upcoming movie, "The Switch", in which she plays a single mother. Aniston suggested that being an unwed mother isn't the worst thing in the world, and that women who have not found the right man can still have a baby on their own.
In typical fashion, O'Reilly went ballistic and claimed that Aniston's remarks were destructive to society and that single motherhood was diminishing the role of fathers. "She's throwing a message out to 12-year-olds and 13-year-olds that, 'Hey you don't need a guy. You don't need a dad,'" he said. "Jennifer Aniston can hire a battery of people to help her, but she can't hire a dad. Dads bring a psychology to children that, in this society, is underemphasized. Men get hosed all day long in the parental arena. The fathers that do try hard are underappreciated and diminished by people like Jennifer Aniston."
While Aniston is not a single mother, and the character she plays in her new movie is just that - a character, there is a very real high profile figure who has made the choice to become a single mother and raise a baby without a father. That person is Bristol Palin, daughter of failed Alaskan governor Sarah Palin, who got pregnant and decided to buck traditional republican values by raising her son on her own without a father in the home, rather than give the baby up for adoption to a loving couple who could give the baby both a father and a mother.
I haven't heard O'Reilly speak out against Bristol's contribution to the destruction of society, nor have I heard him chastise Bristol for diminishing the role of fathers. When can we expect him to defend traditional family values and do so?



